| Summary: | Require License Field in order to Resolve IPBug | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Community | Reporter: | Janet Campbell <janet.campbell> |
| Component: | IPZilla | Assignee: | Bjorn Freeman-Benson <bjorn.freeman-benson> |
| Status: | RESOLVED WONTFIX | QA Contact: | |
| Severity: | enhancement | ||
| Priority: | P3 | CC: | barb.cochrane, bjorn.freeman-benson, gabe.obrien, janet.campbell, sharon.corbett |
| Version: | unspecified | ||
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | PC | ||
| OS: | Windows XP | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
|
Description
Janet Campbell
It turns out this is more technically complicated than you might imagine (we want to avoid implementing work flow inside bugzilla code as much as possible). How important is this? Can you (Janet, Sharon, Barb) not just check that the license is specified in the IPzilla before marking it as approved? I'm going to close this as RESOLVED/WONTFIX. If this is important enough, go ahead and reopen it. If you do, please provide some more description about the workflow you expect to see: does the submitter get a reminder if the license field is not specified? does the user interface show a red x over the resolved state so that J/S/B are reminded not to set the resolved state? Etc. |