Some Eclipse Foundation services are deprecated, or will be soon. Please ensure you've read this important communication.

Bug 203480

Summary:

DVT33:TCT817: ITA: different page titles

Product:

[Eclipse Project] JDT

Reporter:

CDE Administration <cdeadmin>

Component:

Doc

Assignee:

JDT-Doc-Inbox <jdt-doc-inbox>

Status:

CLOSED FIXED

QA Contact:

Severity:

normal

Priority:

CC:

camle, kitlo, martinae, Tod_Creasey

Version:

3.3

Target Milestone:

3.4 M2

Hardware:

OS:

Windows XP

URL:

817

Whiteboard:

Attachments:

Description	Flags
020_ITA.GIF	none

Description CDE Administration

2007-09-14 15:31:38 EDT

<response_by> maria cristina caroletti at 2007.09.14.10.56.42 </response_by>
OS: Windows 2000
Build Date: base: 20070912, help: 20070912
Must Fix: NO
Blocking: NO
Language: IT
Tester Name: Carlo Tirroni
Problem Description:
The TOC title "Preparazione del workbench" (preparing the workbench) links to a page titled "Preparazione di Eclipse" (Preparing Eclipse). This happens in English, also. Please see attached screenshot.

Thanks,
Carlo Tirroni

<response_by> Cam-Thu Le at 2007.09.14.14.15.05 </response_by>
Kit, can you open a bug. Thanks.

<response_by> Kit Lo at 2007.09.14.14.29.48 </response_by>
assigning to JDT/Doc

<response_by> Kit Lo at 2007.09.14.14.30.06 </response_by>
This article was reassigned from Category:''DVT''.

Comment 1 CDE Administration

2007-09-14 15:31:46 EDT

Created attachment 78463 [details]
020_ITA.GIF

Comment 2 CDE Administration

2007-09-14 15:31:51 EDT

<cde:tctdetail>
Testcase: help/topic/org.eclipse.jdt.doc.user/gettingStarted/qs-2.htm
Project: WSW33
Component: CDE - JDT/Doc
Priority: 2
Subject: ITA: different page titles
Article ID: 817
Originator: cristina@it.ibm.com
</cde:tctdetail>

Comment 3 Martin Aeschlimann

2007-09-17 04:47:19 EDT

fixed in 3.4 HEAD. I think this a minor issue and doesn't require a 3.3.x fix. Reopen the bug if you disagree.

Comment 4 CDE Administration

2007-09-19 09:12:57 EDT

<response_by> maria cristina caroletti at 2007.09.19.07.53.49 </response_by>
Hi,
I agree with the decision. Will include this defect in the sign off as defect to be considered and verified for the next release.

Thanks,
Carlo