Some Eclipse Foundation services are deprecated, or will be soon. Please ensure you've read this important communication.

Bug 197161

Summary:	Committer Provisions - July 19, 2007
Product:	Community	Reporter:	Sharon Corbett <sharon.corbett>
Component:	CVS	Assignee:	Eclipse Webmaster <webmaster>
Status:	RESOLVED FIXED	QA Contact:
Severity:	normal
Priority:	P3	CC:	anne.jacko, Ed.Merks, nboldt, tao
Version:	unspecified
Target Milestone:	---
Hardware:	PC
OS:	Windows XP
Whiteboard:

Description Sharon Corbett

2007-07-19 11:56:10 EDT

1.  Please suspend the following committer as they have not responded to request for new ECF to cover all sub components of Webtools as the Webtools project is currently structured - Sinan Konya

2.  New Committer, Carl Anderson, Webtools - Webtools, JST, WST

3.  Please close and delete the following committer account, James Ervin per PMC request.

Clean UP of Modeling EMF and Modeling EMFT:

4.  Please close and delete Elena Litani's account - she no longer wishes to be  a committer at all.

4.  Please close and delete Frank Budinsky's account - he no longer wishes to be  a committer at all.

5.  Please remove Sheldon Lee's access to Modeling EMF only

6.  Please remove Cedric Brun's access to Modeling EMF, his access should be Modeling EMFT.  Assume the same provisioning access within EMFT as was in EMF.

7.  Please remove Jonathan Musset's access to Modeling EMF, his access should be Modeling EMFT.  Assume the same provisioning access within EMFT as was in EMF.

8.  Please remove Antoine Toulme's access to Modeling EMF, his access should be Modeling EMFT.  Assume the same provisioning access wtithin EMFT as was in EMF.

9.  Please remove John Duimovich's access to Modeling EMF only.

Any questions concerning EMF/EMFT please let me know.  thanks, Sharon

Comment 1 Ed Merks

2007-07-19 16:42:32 EDT

Nick, I added you to the CC list so you can double check who all has file permissions for what and ensure that committers only have access rights to their respective components.

Comment 2 Nick Boldt

2007-07-19 18:26:32 EDT

> 6.  Please remove Cedric Brun's access to Modeling EMF, his access should be
> Modeling EMFT.  Assume the same provisioning access within EMFT as was in EMF.
> 
> 7.  Please remove Jonathan Musset's access to Modeling EMF, his access should
> be Modeling EMFT.  Assume the same provisioning access within EMFT as was in
> EMF.
> 
> 8.  Please remove Antoine Toulme's access to Modeling EMF, his access should be
> Modeling EMFT.  Assume the same provisioning access wtithin EMFT as was in EMF.

As currently set up (unix groups, anyway) all looks good here, with the assumption that only Cedric will be promoting/maintaining builds (emftadmin). 

$ groups jmusset atoulme cbrun
jmusset : common emf-compare emf-compare-releng
atoulme : common stp-dev stp-home emf-compare emf-compare-releng
cbrun : common emft-home emftadmin emf-compare emf-compare-releng

I don't see where these three committers have access to Modeling EMF... which suggests you're not talking about unix groups. ;-)

cbrun does not require the group emft-home, as the EMFT website (/cvsroot/org.eclipse/www/emft/) is moving to /cvsroot/org.eclipse/www/modeling/emft (bug 194409) and he does not need to update docs on the website when the Wiki exists for that purpose.

Comment 3 Denis Roy

2007-08-17 13:29:15 EDT

I'm afraid of asking, but is there anything that needs to be done here, or has work on this been commenced?

Comment 4 Nick Boldt

2007-08-17 14:38:33 EDT

(In reply to comment #3)
> I'm afraid of asking, but is there anything that needs to be done here, or has
> work on this been commenced?

6,7,8 seem to be not required. Not sure about the status of 1-4,4,5,9. (There are 2 #4s.) 

As this was assigned to Webmaster I'm assuming if you don't know the status then they're prolly not yet done. ;-)

Comment 5 Eclipse Webmaster

2007-08-17 16:10:48 EDT

#1,2,3,4,4,5 and 9 were done.  Around #6 things got confusing and that's ultimately what led to bug 198541.

-M.

Comment 6 Pawel Wolniewicz

2007-09-26 07:50:14 EDT

*** Bug 199213 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***