Some Eclipse Foundation services are deprecated, or will be soon. Please ensure you've read this important communication.

Bug 187659

Summary:	New Compare Build + Promote scripts
Product:	[Modeling] EMFCompare	Reporter:	Nick Boldt <nboldt>
Component:	Core	Assignee:	EMF Compare <emf.compare-inbox>
Status:	CLOSED FIXED	QA Contact:	Nick Boldt <nboldt>
Severity:	normal
Priority:	P3
Version:	unspecified
Target Milestone:	---
Hardware:	PC
OS:	Linux
Whiteboard:

Description Nick Boldt

2007-05-17 15:42:23 EDT

As per steps in http://wiki.eclipse.org/index.php/EMFT_Component_Creation, we need a build, which includes:

* website for running builds
* website for publishing (promoting) builds

We also need the features/plugins to be properly organized to work with the PDE build, as per http://wiki.eclipse.org/index.php/EMFT_Procedures

This bug is a placeholder for discussion about status and issues that come up along the way. This bug will be done when:

* the first good build is published to Eclipse.org & shows up on EMFT website
* release notes are published for the first build
* downloaded build is verified to work using both the zip(s) and the Update Site

Comment 1 Nick Boldt

2007-05-24 13:02:42 EDT

First successful N build created today using Eclipse 3.3. We need to support Eclipse 3.2 too, so I need to resolve some issues w/ the test harness.

Comment 2 Nick Boldt

2007-05-24 15:04:08 EDT

emf.compare now building w/ EMF 2.2 and Eclipse 3.2. EMFT Procedures doc updated. http://wiki.eclipse.org/index.php?title=EMFT_Procedures&diff=37403&oldid=36474

Ready to proceed to next steps:

* [Cedric] tag your code (manually with Eclipse or commandline w/ cvs)
* [Cedric] update your mapfile using those tag(s)
* [Cedric] run an I build using that map file
* [Cedric] promote a build (with help from Nick as needed)
* [Cedric/Nick] verify all artifacts created @ eclipse.org

Comment 3 Nick Boldt

2007-05-31 14:00:37 EDT

Any progress on promoting your first build?

Comment 4 Nick Boldt

2007-06-13 17:45:04 EDT

First build promoted today, which uncovered some problems which have now been fixed.

Additionally, the Compare SDK's doc plugin contains no javadoc though it is in CVS. This can be fixed as a separate bug or as part of this one. Moving to Assigned.

Comment 5 Nick Boldt

2007-08-01 16:19:37 EDT

Closing. Javadoc issue moved to bug 198585.

Comment 6 Nick Boldt

2008-01-28 16:44:28 EST

Move to verified as per bug 206558.

Comment 7 Laurent Goubet

2011-08-18 04:05:59 EDT

Closing our "resolved" and "verified" bugs.