Some Eclipse Foundation services are deprecated, or will be soon. Please ensure you've read this important communication.

Bug 183026

Summary:	[FastView] [Min/Max] Need two clicks to restore FVB
Product:	[Eclipse Project] Platform	Reporter:	Benjamin Pasero <bpasero>
Component:	UI	Assignee:	Eric Moffatt <emoffatt>
Status:	RESOLVED DUPLICATE	QA Contact:
Severity:	normal
Priority:	P3
Version:	3.3
Target Milestone:	---
Hardware:	PC
OS:	Windows XP
Whiteboard:

Description Benjamin Pasero

2007-04-18 14:37:39 EDT

Eclipse Build id: I20070417-0800

Steps to reproduce:
1.) open a file
2.) maximize the editor while the package explorer is visible
3.) close the editor

Actual results:
Click on the restore button of one of the minimized stacks and nothing happens. You need a second click to restore a stack.

Comment 1 Benjamin Pasero

2007-04-18 14:38:18 EDT

Btw, didn't you change the behavior such as the minimized stacks restore when the last maximized editor got closed?

Comment 2 Eric Moffatt

2007-04-22 22:12:02 EDT

Haven't got there yet. This may be a dup of bug 177850. When you close the editor in this scenario does the editor area atate go back to restored?

Comment 3 Benjamin Pasero

2007-04-27 11:59:05 EDT

(In reply to comment #2)
> Haven't got there yet. This may be a dup of bug 177850. When you close the
> editor in this scenario does the editor area atate go back to restored?
> 

Yes, at least the editor icon shows the maximize state (indicating that the editor is now in its restored state and can be maximized again). However, as I mentioned before, the minimized views are not restored.

Btw using Build id: I20070427-0010 and same results.

Ben

Comment 4 Benjamin Pasero

2007-04-27 12:00:19 EDT

I am not sure if I am easy to understand here :). Its very easy to reproduce btw (see my steps).

Comment 5 Benjamin Pasero

2007-05-22 02:42:27 EDT

Eric I think this can be closed right?

Comment 6 Eric Moffatt

2007-05-22 09:16:26 EDT

Ben, thanks for the pickup...this fell off my radar. Yes, this is no longer an issue.

Comment 7 Eric Moffatt

2007-05-22 09:18:33 EDT

Here's the defect I actually worked against...

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 179702 ***