| Summary: | [Article] Translate "Rich Client Tutorial" series to Chinese | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Community | Reporter: | Richard <richard> | ||||||||
| Component: | Articles | Assignee: | community.articles-inbox <community.articles-inbox> | ||||||||
| Status: | RESOLVED FIXED | QA Contact: | |||||||||
| Severity: | normal | ||||||||||
| Priority: | P3 | CC: | wangjunl | ||||||||
| Version: | unspecified | ||||||||||
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||||||||||
| Hardware: | PC | ||||||||||
| OS: | Windows XP | ||||||||||
| URL: | http://www.eclipseworld.org/ | ||||||||||
| Whiteboard: | |||||||||||
| Attachments: |
|
||||||||||
|
Description
Richard
(In reply to comment #0) > The Chinese eclipse community want to contribute our translation of "Rich > Client Tutorial" series. It is so necessary for chinese users to learn Eclipse technology. :) Using Bugzilla to trace the progress is a good idea. ;-) I think this is a great idea +1 Created attachment 58547 [details]
Chinese version of RCP tuturial part 1.
Init draft of the Chinese version of RCP tuturial part 1.
I uploaded the init draft or RCT tuturial part 1. There'll be still some words need to be changed. Please reivew it and let me know your feeling. Thanks Created attachment 59430 [details]
Chinese version of RCP tuturial part 2.
Init draft of the Chinese version of RCP tutorial part 2.
Created attachment 60214 [details]
Chinese version of RCP tuturial part 3.
The articles have been uploaded. I have no way of reviewing this material myself. We can either (a) wait for a reviewer, or (b) go ahead and just publish it anyway. If we go with (b), I'm sure that if there are problems, there will be bug reports... Let me know how you want to proceed. I'm reopening; we don't mark them as fixed until they're posted. Marking it as fixed makes it disappear from my list (which greatly improves the chance that I'll forget about it). Ok, I'm fine of reopening. Just wonder where can we find a reviewer? Any suggestion? (In reply to comment #10) > Just wonder where can we find a reviewer? Any suggestion? No. Let's leave the bug for a day. Maybe somebody will step up. I assume that you have had it proofread by colleagues. That may be enough. If we don't hear from anybody by Wednesday, I propose that we just post them. If there's problems, they'll be reported through bugzilla. Does this sound reasonable to you? I have posted the draft on www.eclipseworld.org for review. I haven't gotten any comments of errors. I think it's fine to me if we could post it maybe this week. (In reply to comment #12) > I have posted the draft on www.eclipseworld.org for review. I haven't gotten > any comments of errors. I think it's fine to me if we could post it maybe this > week. > Did you have to give up any rights to post on eclipseworld.org? Is there any risk that we may be violating copyright or licensing by posting on eclipse.org? No, I don't thinks so. It's free to post tech documents there. Also I talked with the owner of the eclipseworld.org, he provides the full compatible license with eclipse.org. Thanks qiangsheng. We also think it's fine to post it on eclipseworld.org Wayne, if you concern anything, let us know. We can try to work with the owner to figure out if we face any licensing issues. For now,I looks fine. Set to fixed. |