| Summary: | offer drops with the full timestamp in the link/.zip | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Eclipse Project] Platform | Reporter: | Chris McLaren <csmclaren> |
| Component: | Releng | Assignee: | Dean Roberts <dean.t.roberts> |
| Status: | RESOLVED DUPLICATE | QA Contact: | |
| Severity: | blocker | ||
| Priority: | P3 | CC: | erich_gamma |
| Version: | 2.0 | ||
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | PC | ||
| OS: | Windows 2000 | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
|
Description
Chris McLaren
Did you use the integration or the nightly build? The walkback includes a compilation error and 20020508 didn't have this compilation error. ===== !MESSAGE Unresolved compilation problem: The method setProgressMonitor (org.eclipse.core.runtime.NullProgressMonitor) is undefined for the type org.eclipse.jface.text.reconciler.MonoReconciler !STACK java.lang.Error: Unresolved compilation problem: argh. yes, it seems that i was using the nightly build. i checked this problem against the integration build of 20020508 and it does not occur. (from this exercise, i think should at least try and suggest a possible problem here - albeit a much less severe one - that perhaps the download page should offer drops with the full timestamp in the link/.zip.?) changing title and moving to releng We made a brief foray into the realm of naming builds with the entire date and timestamp and where vetoed by members of the community. Seems people want names they can guess (IE datestamp only) as opposed to seemingly random names (IE date + time stamp). We are going partway towards resolving this problem though. We will include the build type (Integration I, Nightly N, Stable S, Release R) as part of the build name and in the zip files. Hope this helps. I am going to mark this bug report a duplicate of the bug report to add the build types to zip names. |