Bugzilla – Full Text Bug Listing
| Summary: | Add support for Mac OSX (X86/Intel) | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Eclipse Project] Platform | Reporter: | Andre Weinand <andre_weinand> | ||||||||
| Component: | Resources | Assignee: | Platform-Resources-Inbox <platform-resources-inbox> | ||||||||
| Status: | RESOLVED FIXED | QA Contact: | |||||||||
| Severity: | normal | ||||||||||
| Priority: | P3 | CC: | info, pombredanne | ||||||||
| Version: | 3.2 | ||||||||||
| Target Milestone: | 3.2 M6 | ||||||||||
| Hardware: | Macintosh | ||||||||||
| OS: | Mac OS X - Carbon (unsup.) | ||||||||||
| Whiteboard: | |||||||||||
| Attachments: |
|
||||||||||
Created attachment 34545 [details]
patch for org.eclipse.core.filesystem
Patches natives/macosx/Makefile to create a Universal Binary of liblocalfile_1_0_0.jnilib
Created attachment 34546 [details]
liblocalfile as Universal Binary
replaces os/macosx/ppc/liblocalfile_1_0_0.jnilib in org.eclipse.core.filesystem.macosx.ppc
Created attachment 34547 [details]
org.eclipse.core.filesystem.macosx.ppc for Intel/PCC
replaces org.eclipse.core.filesystem.macosx.ppc_1.0.0.vXXXXXXXX.jar from Eclipse plugin folder
John, please ignore the third attachment. It is only a convenience for those who run Eclipse on MacIntel and just need a replacement jar... I'm not keen on the idea of adding something like this during milestone week. Is MacIntel support targeting M5, or can we wait until next week? Andre, just so you know, you do have commit rights to this fragment (I appreciate the bug report and advanced warning though). No, MacIntel is not targeting M5 and this can wait until next week (I just wanted to make this availbale for the growing number of MacIntel users). Yes, I know that I have commit rights but I wanted to coordinate this with you. I can apply the patch for the fragment after M5, early next week. My development relies on Eclipse and I just got a new iMac Intel Duo. Please release a working version soon! (In reply to comment #6) > No, MacIntel is not targeting M5 and this can wait until next week (I just > wanted to make this availbale for the growing number of MacIntel users). > > Yes, I know that I have commit rights but I wanted to coordinate this with you. > I can apply the patch for the fragment after M5, early next week. > You don't need the Intel version of this library to run Eclipse on MacIntel. Eclipse falls back to a pure Java implemention Just get one of the latest integration builds (or wait for the finel M5). They have a universal binary of SWT and just run fine on iMac Intel Duo. I've released a universal binary of liblocalfile and updated the tag in core-macosx.map. Marking fixed. Please see bug #138047: Shipping Mac libraries I think we should consider doing the same for the universal version of liblocalfile? Closing this bug again because it indicates when Intel support was added. Opened bug 138723 against platform resources to switch to architecture-independent fragment for mac. |
To support MacOS X on the Intel architecture we should build liblocalfile_1_0_0.jnilib as a Universal Binary.