| Summary: | [Repo View] Enabling working set in CVS perspective breaks CVS functions | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Eclipse Project] Platform | Reporter: | Barys Dubauski <dubauski_psl> |
| Component: | CVS | Assignee: | platform-cvs-inbox <platform-cvs-inbox> |
| Status: | RESOLVED WORKSFORME | QA Contact: | |
| Severity: | major | ||
| Priority: | P5 | CC: | pawel.pogorzelski1 |
| Version: | 3.1 | Keywords: | helpwanted |
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | PC | ||
| OS: | Windows XP | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
|
Description
Barys Dubauski
P1 is working as designed (i.e. only folders that match the current working set are shown). I would agree that we need a stronger indication that a working set is on and is hiding things from the user. As for P2, this works for me. That is, the import is unaffected by the active working set. Could it be that some other problem has caused the import to fail? Is there anything in your error log? [Michael, I could find no relevant messages in log file] I'd like to clarify P2. If your PSF file has entries that point to projects in CVS repository then nothing really gets pulled from repository once "WS1" is applied in "CVS repository" view. I can see messages like "fetching children..." but no actual update and download is happening. Real test should be performed using live repository and doing some real changes in files and try to import PSF or get updates. I'm not sure what you mean exactly by your last sentence. What I did was turn on a working set in the repositories view and then performed an import team project set which proceeded to load several projects into the local workspace. If this is working for you, could you please include the specific steps you did in order to produce the problem. Barys, I tried to reproduce the problem using 3.5 M7 with no success. Considering the above, the only thing to do on this bug is an indication that Michael suggested in comment 1. There is a separate report for the issue, see bug 30242. Marking as WORKSFORME, please reopen if you have more detailed steps. |