Download
Getting Started
Members
Projects
Community
Marketplace
Events
Planet Eclipse
Newsletter
Videos
Participate
Report a Bug
Forums
Mailing Lists
Wiki
IRC
How to Contribute
Working Groups
Automotive
Internet of Things
LocationTech
Long-Term Support
PolarSys
Science
OpenMDM
More
Community
Marketplace
Events
Planet Eclipse
Newsletter
Videos
Participate
Report a Bug
Forums
Mailing Lists
Wiki
IRC
How to Contribute
Working Groups
Automotive
Internet of Things
LocationTech
Long-Term Support
PolarSys
Science
OpenMDM
Toggle navigation
Bugzilla – Attachment 8664 Details for
Bug 53617
[Icons] New/alternate icons required by platform-ui for 3.0
Home
|
New
|
Browse
|
Search
|
[?]
|
Reports
|
Requests
|
Help
|
Log In
[x]
|
Terms of Use
|
Copyright Agent
Some Eclipse Foundation services are deprecated, or will be soon. Please ensure you've read
this important communication.
Icon Critique
(text/plain), 8.73 KB, created by
Chris McLaren
on 2004-03-18 15:06:40 EST
(
hide
)
Description:
Icon Critique
Filename:
MIME Type:
Creator:
Chris McLaren
Created:
2004-03-18 15:06:40 EST
Size:
8.73 KB
patch
obsolete
>MVM posted a preliminary screenshot of new icons here: > >http://dev.eclipse.org/viewcvs/index.cgi/%7Echeckout%7E/platform-ui-home/R3_0-Look/3.0workbench_icons.png > > >John-Mason Shackelford commented: > >In general I like the new icons. I looked at them on both 15 and 19 inch >monitors and at 600x800, 1024x768, and 1152 x 864. I describe a few which >are unclear below. > >11. problems_view.gif - The original icon clearly says 'problem.' The new >one just looks like a list with different types of items. > >15. build_exec.gif - The ones and zeros which indicate binary are so small >as to be lost when viewed at 1024 x 768 on a 15 inch monitor. > >29. debug_exec.gif - The bug's head and feet are small enough that it is >hard to tell that it is a bug without looking closely. > >40. import_wiz.gif - The former import and export icons were clear because >they didn't look much like other icons. The new ones could be mistaken for a >number of different things. Notice how many icons we have that have a >rectangle as the central element. If you don't like the old icons, perhaps >try a familiar continent shape with an arrow pointing in or out. > >41. export_wiz.gif - same as 40. > >72. stop_nav.gif - This icon does not say stop to me, it just looks like a >blue box. > >84. up_nav.gif - That the green on the folder is an up arrow is not >immediately discernable. I had to look closely. > >114. builder.gif - same as 15. > >Color issues: > >Red X for delete is a very common, recognizable idiom. I would not recommend >changing these to blue or grey such as in 22., 51., and 54. That the red is >bright enough to be easily seen is helpful. > >From an aesthetic perspective, I think the sharper lines in the former arrow >icons (32., 33., 34.,) were clearer and easier on the eye. > >The color shift between A and Z in the new 65. alpha_mode.gif is too subtle >to be a helpful visual queue. The red Z in the old icon made it very easy to >recognize. > > >Jared Burns commented: > >I agree with what John-Mason said on numbers 11, 29, and 72. > >In addition: > >5. The subtle lines of text drawn in the old bookmark icon was nice. I >think they would look nice in the new one too (otherwise, it looks like >a very uninteresting book :P). > >41, 46, 48. If import is down and to the right, I think export should be >up and to the left? > >60. I think the old icon means "collapse all" more than the new one. >Maybe just update it to the same feel as the others (fade it out)? > > >Douglas Pollock commented: > >On March 12, 2004 05:41 pm, Jared Burns wrote: >> 5. The subtle lines of text drawn in the old bookmark icon was nice. I >> think they would look nice in the new one too (otherwise, it looks like >> a very uninteresting book :P). > >5.) I agree. The lines of text are important in giving the impression of a >book. The more distinct bookma is very nice though. > >11.) I agree with John's commenon #11 as well. The error and warning markers >are displayed in the original image -- making it clear what the original icon >is saying. The new icon looks like a stop light. > >29.) Amorphous blob? Mmmm... nothing like some a singular-celled organism to >make me eager to code.... :P > >60.) I liked the previous collapse all. It stood out, was fairly clear about >its purpose, and I used it lots. > >72.) I agree with John's comments. "X", red (colour blindness issues) and >octagons mean stop to me. Squares mean stop, but only when placed next to a >triangle play button. > >Oh, and one things that's bothered me about both Eclipse and Visual Age >(Smalltalk and Java). Could we please drop the running man? It was a great >80s flick, but this is a world of triangles and squares. I think the >"stop/play/pause" metaphor from stereo and video equipment is a little more >90s. > > >Sebastian Davids commented: > >5. The new looks better because it doesn't look so crowded as the old one. > >11. It isn't obvious what the colors red, yellow, blue stand for. > >15. & 114. at 1280x1024 the 1's and 0's are hard to see, at 1024*768 they're >fine > >27. at 1280x1024 it's hard to tell that it's supposed to be a torch; more >contrast could help > >29. head could be a little bit larger and legs a little bit longer > >31. at 1280x1024 it's hard to tell that it's supposed to be a printer > >47. & 48. like the new icons; the old ones are just plain ugly > >60. new one doesn't symbolize collapse all > >72. red is the color of a stop sign; so stop should be in red > >77. at 1280x1024 the yellow arrow is just a yellow blob; different >shape/more contrast could help > >84. color combination yellow + green just bites in the eyes ,) > >119. at 1280x1024 the arrow just doesn't look like an arrow; more contrast >could help > > >David Stewart commented: > >New Eclipse icons look good, collapse all icon is bit more intuitive. > > >Randy Hudson commented: > >An interesting question will be how many times have the old icons been copied into other places? > >A lot of the icons look WASHED OUT. For example, Run, Delete, filter task, list_mode, ... everything. >I like the new softer gradients inside shapes, but I don't like the low-contast borders and removal of color (red). The contrast definitely needs to be brought back. > >38) the old "sparkle" decoration was more familiar than the miniature OTI logo which replaced it. >39) Why are we no longer differentiating between Wizard and New..? Again, shrunken OTI logo. > >40) The new import icon says nothing. It is just a box and a triangle, which is supposed to indicate a direction. But really the convention for a triangle in the bottom-right corner means that the button is a drop-down. For an example, look at Photoshop's palette. >41) same for export > >Many of the arrows look bloated. Forward, Undo, Redo, Step... > >72) don't like it. Maybe it should be black? > > >Andre Luepke commented: > >problems_view - Hmmm, the icon doesn't look like problems at all. >debug_excc - the old bug is better recognizable, but the new one >is...well...ok >new_wiz - definitely not!! Wizard icons must have the magic wand!! >import_wiz - Hmm, not so sure about that one. The arrow is too tiny >export_wiz - The arrow is too far a away from the other thing and it is >still very tiny >newprj_wiz - I want the wand back! >newfolder_wiz - I want the wand back! >newfile_wiz - I want the wand back! >remtsk_tsk - The cross should be red.. >rembkmrk_tsk - The cross should be red.. >showwarn_tsk - The old one is a lot more readable >showchild_mode - Keep the old one! >showparents_mode - Keep the old one! >stop_nav - The old one is a lot better!!!! Stop should be red! >up_nav - I like the old one a bit more > >I mentioned only the bad things, because in my opinion it will be more >usefull for you. So, all the other, not mentioned, icons are grrrrreat :) >Although some of them look a little bit to blurred!! > > >Mike Wilson commented: > >27. search_src doesn't look like a flashlight any more; it looks more like the end of a marker (i.e. end at top right). >60. collapseall doesn't mean much to me; of course the old one sucked too. >72. stop_nav doesn't mean anything to me. > > >Stefan Matthias Aust commented: > >Overall, nice consistent look although there's less constrast (and I'm >on a high-contrast TFT right now), especially if looked at on a white >background. > >1. For me, the clipboard is associated to copy&paste not tasks. The old >icons isn't much better, though, I'd associate that icon with >"Preferences" or some other dialog. > >11. red-yellow-green is a traffic light (at least in Germany) Why's a >traffic light associated with problems? I like the old icon better. > >22. Delete is something dangerous and therefore it should be RED, not gray. > >29. the bug looks washed, I can hardly recognise it. Same is true for >the running man in 37. > >32-34,68-70 I dislike the rounded end of the arrows. Generally, I'm >more in favor with edges, for example regarding 8 or 43. > >39, 42-44 The magic wand was IMHO the better association for a wizard >than a tiny yellow plus sign. > >40-41 The arrows are too subtil. > >47-48 the new icons are much better. The old one always looked like an >EYE (of the beholder) to me. > >50-52 in combination with + and x and pen, the clipboard makes sense. > >51,54 I'd prefer red for delete > >56 Stronly dislike it > >57 even more dislike it. The old one was much better > >Sidenote: I borrows both icons for my own application and I always >missed a nice "info" icons in a similar style. I think, Eclipse has >somewhere a blue "i" for information, but I'd prefer a white "i" on a >blue background with the same subtile shadow. The new icons are IMHO >too big, being only 12x12, they worked very well with text. > >72 With a bit of imagination, the old icon was a 8-sided stop sign. That >was more obvious to me than a blue box (probably the stop button of some >VHS recorder or similar) > >96 this looks great, but I dislike the roundings on 97 > >98 aha, here's the "i" I mentioned, I'd prefer if that would look >similar to the other two icons. > > >
You cannot view the attachment while viewing its details because your browser does not support IFRAMEs.
View the attachment on a separate page
.
View Attachment As Raw
Actions:
View
Attachments on
bug 53617
:
8350
|
8370
| 8664 |
8686
|
8689
|
8690
|
8691
|
8692
|
8693
|
8694
|
8708
|
8709
|
9224
|
9284
|
10031
|
10311
|
11045