Attachment 54238 Details for Bug 165224 – Example mail

Some Eclipse Foundation services are deprecated, or will be soon. Please ensure you've read this important communication.

Example mail

bugzilla-hanging.txt (text/plain), 2.96 KB, created by Gunnar Wagenknecht

on 2006-11-21 01:52:43 EST

(hide)

Description:

Filename:

MIME Type:

Creator: Gunnar Wagenknecht

Created: 2006-11-21 01:52:43 EST

Size: 2.96 KB

patch

obsolete

>From - Sat Nov 18 14:22:22 2006
>X-Account-Key: account7
>X-UIDL: GmailId10efb06a7ced918a
>X-Mozilla-Status: 0001
>X-Mozilla-Status2: 00000000
>X-Gmail-Received: da5cd9e13764a7ad5bc23fb17b45f58aa7be9984
>Delivered-To: gunnar@wagenknecht.org
>Received: by 10.35.18.17 with SMTP id v17cs366615pyi;
>        Sat, 18 Nov 2006 04:24:49 -0800 (PST)
>Received: by 10.65.224.11 with SMTP id b11mr4498834qbr.1163852689128;
>        Sat, 18 Nov 2006 04:24:49 -0800 (PST)
>Return-Path: <wwwrun@eclipse.org>
>Received: from mail.eclipse.org (node2.eclipse.org [206.191.52.52])
>        by mx.google.com with ESMTP id f18si6033221qba.2006.11.18.04.24.46;
>        Sat, 18 Nov 2006 04:24:49 -0800 (PST)
>Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of wwwrun@eclipse.org designates 206.191.52.52 as permitted sender)
>Received: by mail.eclipse.org (Postfix, from userid 30)
>	id 98E6218B0E; Sat, 18 Nov 2006 07:24:46 -0500 (EST)
>Subject: [Bug 165005] bugzilla hangin
>X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo
>In-Reply-To: <bug-165005-590@https.bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/>
>To: gunnar@wagenknecht.org
>From: bugzilla-daemon@eclipse.org
>Message-Id: <20061118122446.98E6218B0E@mail.eclipse.org>
>Date: Sat, 18 Nov 2006 07:24:46 -0500 (EST)
>
>https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=165005 
>Product/Component: Community / Bugzilla
>
>
>denis.roy@eclipse.org changed:
>
>           What    |Removed                     |Added
>----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
>         Resolution|                            |DUPLICATE
>
>
>
>
>------- Comment #5 from jeff_mcaffer@ca.ibm.com  2006-11-17 20:36 -------
>of course, when committing comment 4 I just had this behaviour again...
>
>
>------- Comment #6 from jeff_mcaffer@ca.ibm.com  2006-11-17 20:36 -------
>Interestingly, comment 5 committed just fine
>
>
>------- Comment #7 from jeff_mcaffer@ca.ibm.com  2006-11-17 20:37 -------
>as did comment 6.  I could do this all night! ;-)
>
>
>------- Comment #8 from denis.roy@eclipse.org  2006-11-18 07:30 -------
>When we have only one database server running, bugzilla performs like a total
>slouch. Jeff, reported this 18 days ago here: bug 162820
>
>bug 117344 explains more about the design issues of bugzilla, and why it's a
>slouch under heavy load.
>
>bug 164806 explains what's preventing us from running the slave as it should
>be.
>
>bug 164433 explains what happens when we optimistically run the slave (getting
>good bugzilla performance) only to have the slave replication end unexpectedly
>at 2:00am while all the sysadmins are trying to get some sleep.
>
>We're working on it.  We really are.  Believe me. We feel your pain. We use
>Bugzilla too.
>
>*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 153818 ***
>
>
>
>-- 
>Configure bugzilla e-mail: https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
>------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
>You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
>

Actions: View

Attachments on bug 165224: 54238